[flext] Overriding delete operator

[Arshia Cont]

I confirm that this works!!! Thanks Thomas.


On Jun 23, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Thomas Grill wrote:

> Hi Arshia,
> sorry for the delay, i was busy with finishing my PhD - see http://grrrr.org/drthesis-2012 .
> 
> The overriding of the constructor and destructor can be avoided by defining the FLEXT_USE_CMEM preprocessor symbol which i recommend when using the STL.
> Please let me know if this helps!
> all the best,
> Thomas
> 
> Am 19.06.2012 um 11:50 schrieb Arshia Cont:
> 
>> Hi list,
>> 
>> It seems to me that Flext objects, by default, attempt to call a delete operator that is owned by Flext even if they shouldn't:
>> 
>> 0   com.cycling74.Max             	0x00033889 sysmem_freeptr_imp + 13
>> 1   com.cycling74.MaxAPI          	0x017631c2 sysmem_freeptr + 34
>> 2   antescofo~                    	0x83bf6d10 flext_root_multi::operator delete(void*) + 24
>> 3   antescofo~                    	0x83be5ba7 std::_Vector_base<double, std::allocator<double> >::_M_deallocate(double*, unsigned long) + 21
>> 
>> Here, the delete is called by STD but flext delete is called instead… .
>> 
>> If it was in my code, I would have called with correct namespace but it's not!
>> 
>> Any way to override this?
>> 
>> Arshia Cont
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://grrrr.org/ext/flext
>> 
>> flext mailing list
>> flext at grrrr.org
>> http://grrrr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flext
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://grrrr.org/ext/flext
> 
> flext mailing list
> flext at grrrr.org
> http://grrrr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flext
>